The transition into adulthood may differ depending on cultural traditions and rites of passage from adolescence to adulthood. The transition into adulthood

The transition into adulthood may differ depending on cultural traditions and rites of passage from adolescence to adulthood. The transition into adulthood is also a time for relationships and romance from a normative perspective, though this, too, will vary across cultures. In this week’s discussion, consider cultural variation in relationships and rites of passage and their relationship to normative developmental milestones.

In your post, be sure to address the following:

  • Research and describe two unique rites of passage to adulthood from a culture other than your own. Explain their impact on normative development in the context of that culture.
  • Summarize the different types of attraction presented in this week’s readings, and explain how these manifest differently or lead to different relationship outcomes based on their cultural context and norms. For example, are there cultures in which a particular type of attraction may not serve a young person well?

In your response to your peers, offer additional insight on the discussed rites of passage. Be sure to support your perspectives with scholarly research.

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

SEE ATTACHMENTS and RUBRIC Assignment 4 Instructions Title Page (Corrected from Assignment 2)              Make sure your assignment contains an updated

SEE ATTACHMENTS and RUBRIC Assignment 4 Instructions Title Page (Corrected from Assignment 2)              Make sure your assignment contains an updated title page from Assignment 2 incorporating the feedback from Assignment 2. Refer to APA Style link to see the specifics for a student paper title page in APA. Refer to

Please write an introduction following the grading rubic below and the thematic grid attached from the listed 5 articles. Grading

Please write an introduction following the grading rubic below and the thematic grid attached from the listed 5 articles. Grading Rubric:                                                                         Poor                                  Excellent Possible Introduction                                                   13.75   16.25   18.75   21.25   23.75   25 Start w/problem statement – why do this?  And lead into a theory – why do we predict the  variables to be related? Theories explain why Review

Please follow the attached literature grid and provide an introduction for the five (5) articles listed below. 1. Bänninger-Huber, E., & Salvenauer, S.

Please follow the attached literature grid and provide an introduction for the five (5) articles listed below. 1. Bänninger-Huber, E., & Salvenauer, S. (2023). Different types of laughter and their function foremotion regulation in dyadic interactions. Current Psychology: A Journal for DiversePerspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 42(28), 24249–24259. 2. Cai,

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitive development. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects of

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitive development. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects of

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is

SUBJECT: CHILD PSYCHOLOGY INSTRUCTIONS: Part 1: Article ReviewRead Bjorklund (2018) A metatheory for cognitive development (or “Piaget is Dead”Revisited).Introduction: Bjorklund’s paper argues for a new organizational structure for cognitivedevelopment. This structure is most compatible with core-knowledge and dynamic-systems theories discussed in chapter 4, but also encompasses major aspects ofinformation-processing theories