Scenario: To further develop your skills as a literacy coach, you have been asked to review and analyze a series of case studies of students

Scenario: To further develop your skills as a literacy coach, you have been asked to review and analyze a series of case studies of students demonstrating a variety of reading problems. You will make recommendations for assessments to diagnose the reading problems based on your analysis. These case studies will be shared in a future professional development workshop. 

 

View the “

Five Domains of Reading
” learning module. 

 

Read and
analyze the 5 case studies presented.  

 

Research reading assessments as recommended by the National Reading Panel, Reading First, Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, the Reading Excellence Act of 1997, or other more current legislation as applicable. The following list of formal and informal assessments may be a good place to start your research:

· Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS®) 

· Early Reading Diagnostic Assessment™ (ERDA®) 

· Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests® 

· Developmental Reading Assessment®  

· Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing™ (CTOPP™) 

· Phonological Awareness Test™ (PAT™) 

· Informal reading inventories

· ORF (oral reading fluency) measures

 

Write a 175- to 200-word analysis for each case study in which you address the following: 

· Identify and explain the reading challenge or problem suspected in the case study. Consider which reading domain(s) each student struggles with the most.

· Recommend 3 specific formal and/or informal diagnostic tools, screening tools, or inventories that you might use to measure students’ reading abilities and determine the reading problem.

· Provide a rationale for your selected diagnostic tools, screening tools, or inventories ranked in the order that you would implement them.

Note: You should have a total of 5 analyses, 1 for each case study. 

Refer to this week’s readings and learning activities for pertinent ideas and information.

Cite your sources according to APA guidelines.  

Review the grading rubric for details about assignment expectations. 

Submit your assignment. 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Chart SPD-485 Literacy Case Studies Key for Percentiles Low: Student scores lower than

Chart SPD-485 Literacy Case Studies Key for Percentiles Low: Student scores lower than the 21st percentile. Low to Average: Student scores in the 21st-40th percentile. Average: Student scores in the 41st-60th percentile. Average-High: Student scores in the 61st-80th percentile. High: Student scores in the 81st and above percentile. Elementary School

Classroom Management Programs Presentation:          100 pts.  You will choose from one of the following nationally known and implemented classroom

Classroom Management Programs Presentation:          100 pts.  You will choose from one of the following nationally known and implemented classroom management programs:  Responsive Classroom Love and Logic  Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Responsible Thinking Process  Real Restitution  *Others may be approved by instructor*You will conduct independent research on

lesson plan CPD 3 Competency Title/Statement: CPD 3: Plans and implements, in partnership with families, culturally, individually, and

lesson plan CPD 3 Competency Title/Statement: CPD 3: Plans and implements, in partnership with families, culturally, individually, and developmentally responsive curricular strategies and interaction that nurture infant/toddler development, learning, and mental health, and well-being. Summative Competency Assessment  Time estimate to complete the summative assessment: 6 hours Summative Assessment Type: Written