FLA Assignment C Rubric 1-    Criteria            Insight into

  FLA Assignment C Rubric

1-    Criteria

 

        
Insight into Conflict

 

Depth of analysis and understanding of the conflict presented including own and others’ roles.

 

 

 

Mark (5%)

The work consistently demonstrates clear insight well beyond a recounting of facts.

 

2-    Criteria

           Antecedents to Conflict

 

 

Mark (15%)

The author provides consistent evidence of deep analysis including: taking multiple perspectives; implications; and considering both internal and external factors affecting agents.

 

There is a strong and meaningful connection between the conflict and the literature

 

3.
Criteria

 

Implications of the Conflict

 

Mark (15%)

 

 

There is a detailed analysis of the implications of the conflict for all directly and indirectly affected stakeholders.

Relevant literature is integrated to support the authors arguments.

 

4.
Criteria

Resolution of the Conflict

 

Mark (15%)

 

Clear, evidence-based strategies have been discussed in the relation to the resolution of the incident.

 

 

5-    Criteria

Communication Clarity and correctness of written expression.

 

Mark (5%)

 

A pleasure to read. Consistently precise and unambiguous wording, clear and lucid sentence structure. Flawless grammar and spelling.

 

6-    Criteria

Writing and Presentation and citation

 

Formatting of the paper and references.

 

 

Mark (5%)

 

Paper is presented in full accordance with APA format.

Citations and references are formatted flawlessly throughout.

Sources of ideas are correctly attributed in all cases.

Paper is within the recommended word count.

 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Chapter 1-Discussion 1: Chapter 2-Discussion 2: Outsmarting the Liars (see attached)  This should be no longer than two paragraphs per discussion and

Chapter 1-Discussion 1: Chapter 2-Discussion 2: Outsmarting the Liars (see attached)  This should be no longer than two paragraphs per discussion and should show your understanding of the week’s readings. Assignment has to demonstrate a meaningful synthesis of the material posted (typically a research article) and the corresponding chapter assigned

Book: https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9781071851753/epubcfi/6/2[%3Bvnd.vst.idref% 3Dcover]!/4/2[cover-image]/2%4033:0 1-2 Journal:

Book: https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9781071851753/epubcfi/6/2[%3Bvnd.vst.idref% 3Dcover]!/4/2[cover-image]/2%4033:0 1-2 Journal: Position on the Core Themes Throughout the history of the field of developmental psychology, three core conflicts have emerged in the examination of the theories and concepts (nature vs. nurture, continuity vs. discontinuity, and stability vs. change). In this journal assignment, you will show your

Book: https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9781071851753/epubcfi/6/2[%3Bvnd.vst.idref% 3Dcover]!/4/2[cover-image]/2%4033:0 1-1

Book: https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/reader/books/9781071851753/epubcfi/6/2[%3Bvnd.vst.idref% 3Dcover]!/4/2[cover-image]/2%4033:0 1-1 Discussion: Developmental Research Challenge Research forms the foundation for the field of developmental psychology, and given the complexity of the human experience throughout the life span, the methods chosen for conducting research are key to producing valid and reliable data. In your initial post, locate a

  Describe your problem statement.  Discuss the existing literature surrounding your problem statement within your chosen specialty area.  Explain how

  Describe your problem statement.  Discuss the existing literature surrounding your problem statement within your chosen specialty area.  Explain how you would solve your problem and support with existing literature, data, and information.  Explain how you would design your own research methods to solve your problem.  Provide an analysis of